William C. Thompson

William C. Thompson

University of California, Irvine

H-index: 44

North America-United States

About William C. Thompson

William C. Thompson, With an exceptional h-index of 44 and a recent h-index of 24 (since 2020), a distinguished researcher at University of California, Irvine, specializes in the field of Law, psychology, forensic science, DNA testing, jury decision making.

His recent articles reflect a diverse array of research interests and contributions to the field:

Misuse of statistical method results in highly biased interpretation of forensic evidence in

Commentary on Guyll et al.(2023): Misuse of Statistical Method Results in Highly Biased Interpretation of Forensic Evidence

Response to False Statements Posted on SSRN by Mark Perlin, CEO of Cybergenetics, and His Employees

Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™

Science, Evidence, Law, and Justice: Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence

Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence

Healthcare serial killer or coincidence? Statistical issues in investigation of suspected medical misconduct

Commentary on: Munro NA. Alcohol and parasomnias: The statistical evaluation of the parasomnia defense in sexual assault, where alcohol is involved. J Forensic Sci. 2020; 65 (4 …

William C. Thompson Information

University

Position

Professor of Criminology Law & Society

Citations(all)

8518

Citations(since 2020)

1943

Cited By

7417

hIndex(all)

44

hIndex(since 2020)

24

i10Index(all)

98

i10Index(since 2020)

44

Email

University Profile Page

University of California, Irvine

Google Scholar

View Google Scholar Profile

William C. Thompson Skills & Research Interests

Law

psychology

forensic science

DNA testing

jury decision making

Top articles of William C. Thompson

Title

Journal

Author(s)

Publication Date

Misuse of statistical method results in highly biased interpretation of forensic evidence in

Law, probability and risk

Michael Rosenblum

Elizabeth T Chin

Elizabeth L Ogburn

Akihiko Nishimura

Daniel Westreich

...

2024/1/1

Commentary on Guyll et al.(2023): Misuse of Statistical Method Results in Highly Biased Interpretation of Forensic Evidence

arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04409

Michael Rosenblum

Elizabeth T Chin

Elizabeth L Ogburn

Akihiko Nishimura

Daniel Westreich

...

2023/9/8

Response to False Statements Posted on SSRN by Mark Perlin, CEO of Cybergenetics, and His Employees

CEO of Cybergenetics, and His Employees (July 5, 2023)

William C Thompson

2023/7/5

Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™

Journal of Forensic Sciences

William C Thompson

2023/5

Science, Evidence, Law, and Justice: Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

William C Thompson

2023/10/10

Shifting decision thresholds can undermine the probative value and legal utility of forensic pattern-matching evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

William C Thompson

2023/10/10

Healthcare serial killer or coincidence? Statistical issues in investigation of suspected medical misconduct

arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00962

PJ Green

Richard D Gill

Neil Mackenzie

Julia Mortera

WC Thompson

2022/10/3

Commentary on: Munro NA. Alcohol and parasomnias: The statistical evaluation of the parasomnia defense in sexual assault, where alcohol is involved. J Forensic Sci. 2020; 65 (4 …

Journal of forensic sciences

William Thompson

Mark Pressman

2022/5/1

Using Mixture Models to Examine Group Differences-Studying Juror Perceptions of the Strength of Forensic Science Evidence

Naomi Kaplan-Damary

William Thompson

Rebecca Hofstein Grady

Hal Stern

2021

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards–Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Forensic Science International: Synergy

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

Cedric Neumann

Patrick Henry Geoghegan

Gary Edmond

Tim Grant

...

2021/1/1

Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

Ewald Enzinger

Vincent Hughes

Michael Jessen

Didier Meuwly

...

2021/5/1

Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence

William C Thompson

Simon A Cole

2020/7/24

Commentary on: Curley LJ, Munro J, Lages M, MacLean R, Murray J. Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decisions: a review and outlook. J Forensic Sci

William C Thompson

2020/3/1

Parameter estimation using aggregate data

Applied Mathematics Letters

HT Banks

Annabel E Meade

Celia Schacht

Jared Catenacci

W Clayton Thompson

...

2020/2/1

See List of Professors in William C. Thompson University(University of California, Irvine)

Co-Authors

H-index: 97
Geoffrey T. Fong

Geoffrey T. Fong

University of Waterloo

H-index: 69
Stephen J. Lepore

Stephen J. Lepore

Temple University

H-index: 36
Simon A. Cole

Simon A. Cole

University of California, Irvine

H-index: 36
Roger Koppl

Roger Koppl

Syracuse University

H-index: 26
Michael L Raymer

Michael L Raymer

Wright State University

academic-engine