Mark Lemley

Mark Lemley

Stanford University

H-index: 102

North America-United States

About Mark Lemley

Mark Lemley, With an exceptional h-index of 102 and a recent h-index of 57 (since 2020), a distinguished researcher at Stanford University, specializes in the field of Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Internet Law.

His recent articles reflect a diverse array of research interests and contributions to the field:

Illegal interlocks among life science company boards of directors

Free the Market: How We Can Save Capitalism from the Capitalists

The Splinternet

Coopting Disruption

First Amendment Neglect in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Cases

An Empirical Study of the Twenty-Year Patent Term

Role of Antitrust in Preventing Patent Holdup

Red Courts, Blue Courts

Mark Lemley Information

University

Position

Professor of Law

Citations(all)

44678

Citations(since 2020)

10390

Cited By

38285

hIndex(all)

102

hIndex(since 2020)

57

i10Index(all)

195

i10Index(since 2020)

168

Email

University Profile Page

Stanford University

Google Scholar

View Google Scholar Profile

Mark Lemley Skills & Research Interests

Intellectual Property

Antitrust

Internet Law

Top articles of Mark Lemley

Title

Journal

Author(s)

Publication Date

Illegal interlocks among life science company boards of directors

Journal of Law and the Biosciences

Anoop Manjunath

Nathan Kahrobai

Mark A Lemley

Ishan Kumar

2024/1

Free the Market: How We Can Save Capitalism from the Capitalists

Available at SSRN

Mark A Lemley

2024

The Splinternet

Duke LJ

Mark A Lemley

2020

Coopting Disruption

Available at SSRN 4713845

Mark A Lemley

Matthew Wansley

2024/2/1

First Amendment Neglect in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Cases

Available at SSRN

Mark A Lemley

Rebecca Tushnet

2024

An Empirical Study of the Twenty-Year Patent Term

Mark Lemley

2024/1/30

Role of Antitrust in Preventing Patent Holdup

Revista Amagis Jurídica

Carl Shapiro

Mark A Lemley

2024/1/25

Red Courts, Blue Courts

Miss. LJ

Mark A Lemley

2023

How Generative AI turns copyright law on its head

Available at SSRN 4517702

Mark A Lemley

2023/7/21

Brief of Patent Law Professors as Amicus Curiae Supporting the Appellant and Reversal (In re Xencor)

re Xencor

Jacob S Sherkow

Mark A Lemley

2023/10/4

Video Game Law: An Open Access Casebook

Available at SSRN

Mark A Lemley

Sonali Maitra

2023/6/1

The benefit of the bargain

Wis. L. Rev.

Mark A Lemley

2023

The Broken Balance: How “Built-In Apportionment” and the Failure to Apply Daubert Have Distorted Patent Infringement Damages

Available at SSRN

Mark A Lemley

William Lee

2023/9/6

Foundation models and fair use

arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15715

Peter Henderson

Xuechen Li

Dan Jurafsky

Tatsunori Hashimoto

Mark A Lemley

...

2023/3/28

Trademark Spaces and Trademark Law's Secret Step Zero

Stan. L. Rev.

Mark A Lemley

Mark P McKenna

2023

Where's the Liability in Harmful AI Speech?

J. Free Speech L.

Peter Henderson

Tatsunori Hashimoto

Mark Lemley

2023

How to Punish a Robot

Revista Amagis Jurídica

Mark A Lemley

Bryan Casey

2023/11/17

Scarcity, regulation, and the abundance society

Deven R Desai

Mark A Lemley

2023/1/25

Freedom of Speech and AI Output

J. Free Speech L.

Eugene Volokh

Mark A Lemley

Peter Henderson

2023

OPEN ACCESS EDITED BY

Community Series-Extremophiles: Microbial Genomics and Taxogenomics, Volume II

José Luis Losada

Asier Gonzalez-Artetxe

Yousri Elghoul

Júlio A Costa

JA Costa

...

2023/11/22

See List of Professors in Mark Lemley University(Stanford University)

Co-Authors

H-index: 71
Herbert Hovenkamp

Herbert Hovenkamp

University of Pennsylvania

H-index: 60
Lawrence Lessig

Lawrence Lessig

Harvard University

H-index: 53
Eugene Volokh

Eugene Volokh

University of California, Los Angeles

H-index: 46
Bhaven Sampat

Bhaven Sampat

Columbia University in the City of New York

H-index: 45
Dan L. Burk

Dan L. Burk

University of California, Irvine

H-index: 40
Peter Menell

Peter Menell

University of California, Berkeley

academic-engine